Wiki image |
As my writer journey
continues, sometimes I find myself on the other side of the coin. Instead of thrashing about in the blogosphere
grabbing any life preservers I can to stay afloat, sometimes new bloggers ask me how to get started in blogging.
To do a quick re-hash of some
past articles, I had good advice from The Blog Farm early on about
blogging. The basic rule is posting
something for viewers to see (as in a photograph) or read (as in an article). Anyone is welcome to visit my early posts of
this blog, where you’ll see links, videos, and not much of anything.
Like any stubborn person, of
course I had to argue with the expert, like I
knew something about blogging? What am I
to post? Answer: You’re a writer Stupid, so write
something! So I did. My “New Author”
series of articles started my journey as a blogger for reading, writing, and
creativity, and I haven’t looked back since.
So for some analysis based on
my experience alone, and I’ll make a note many more sophisticated and widely
read bloggers are out there. I’m not
small potatoes; sunflower seeds may be a better representation for vegetable
comparisons. What I’ve found that
drives blog traffic is original work. Links might as well come directly from Twitter;
you offer a viewer nothing by a link only as a blog post. The experts say to create a “brand” so
readers will know what you are about, be it reading, cooking, book reviewing,
or artistic design. Therefore, the way
to do that is to post, yes, I’m writing it again, original work, or a guest post, keeping in the “brand” of the blog.
What doesn’t drive blog traffic?
I’ve learned a bit from doing. As
sad it is to say, and I won’t stop doing it, but book reviews of new authors do
not drive traffic. Why? Simple:
Nobody knows the writers. It
doesn’t mean I’ll stop reviewing, as I like doing it , though I’m taking a
break to finish my third book. Also,
articles hit and miss, which is expected from any writer. I can spend hours on one article and get “meh”
from readers going by traffic, and crank out an article about a bestselling novel
and see the traffic peak. Famous books
and stories help blog traffic. Reason: Because they are famous, to state the
obvious.
A better question: Does retweeting lead to more blog
traffic? Answer: Yes and no.
Before clicking off, let me explain.
Most of the time, blogs have a “core” of readers. Retweets are great to increase the exposure,
but the exposure may not be your audience.
Going back to “branding” your tweeps may have different interests than
anothers tweeps. So the exposure is
great, and potentially can drive traffic, but when it comes down to just
numbers, it’s not a direct correspondence between the number of tweeps seeing
your tweet and the number that actually read your article. It’s doesn’t mean retweeting doesn’t help; of
course we all want retweeting! But I’ve
learned to distance myself from the expectation that 20K tweets will add 1000
hits to my blog, which is not always the case.
So writers again go forth and
write awesome blog articles. I love
blogging and am a late discoverer to the awesome recipe blogs. Though the articles compared to novels have a
shorter half-life, we live in a “now” culture, so think it, write it, post it,
and we’ll read it.
I so agree with the content thing - I've noticed that when I post articles about books from unknown authors there is zero interest. Hey - when I get those articles in my email from blogs I follow, I usually delete without reading..... makes me wonder how book bloggers get read. Maybe with giveaways, etc.
ReplyDeleteI've found Monday Blogs to be massive in getting me large amounts of views - for me, it seems that RTs DO work. The posts of mine with the most views are advice for writers ones, anything to do with Twitter, and those about relationship stuff.
I reckon the best way of all to attract more views is to write a good tweet for it!
I think you're right, more exposure does help, probably not direct correspondence depending on your audience. Book bloggers have audiences for their brand as well. But yes, Twitter is an art in itself in 140 characters, I agree. Thank you for commenting!
ReplyDelete