April Wheeler "Revolutionary Road" |
Viserys Targaryen "Game of Thrones" |
In reader book reviews, one of the
first topics usually mentioned is the lead character, and whether the reader
liked him/her or not. Like I’ve written
in the past, the lead character must hook the reader in by good or ill deeds
and often either breathes life or kills the story. Supporting characters have a role as well,
and sometimes a strong supporting character gives enough strength to the story,
or a group of supporting characters, as in the prototype dark fantasy LOTR.
But when readers say they
like or dislike characters, does it mean they are not good characters, in
reference to writing a story? Perhaps
the better term is effective character. Did the character affect the plot? Did you remember the character after you
finished reading the book? Readers often
base preferences on characters they like, meaning that they can relate to, but
when they say they dislike a character does that put down the story? Answer?
Not always, from a writer’s standpoint.
I’ll go back to a non-fantasy
classic mainstream writer’s favorite novel:
“Revolutionary Road” by Richard Yates.
I know plenty of readers that didn’t like the story or film, because of
the depressing ending. But as a reader,
do you remember April Wheeler? The 1950s
housewife who felt trapped in their “safe” post WWII suburban lifestyle and
wanted to act upon her dream of moving to Paris for a different life? She was selfish, hot tempered, but had
dreams. Don’t we all dream? From a writer’s standpoint, is she a great
character? Yes.
Another example, on the other
sphere, my world of dark fantasy: “A
Song of Ice and Fire” books or “Game of Thrones” cable series, take a look at
first season (or first book) at silly stupid older brother of Daenerys, Viserys
Targaryen. I didn’t find anything to
like about Viserys, except that he had the vision of retaking Westeros but the
methods were ideas of others. While we
readers and viewers were glad to be rid of this stupid character (with a scene everyone seems to like) was he an
effective character? Do we remember
him? His family was murdered; he wanted
his birthright crown, so he had a valid argument, though was sexist and
violent. So from a writer’s standpoint,
was he a great character? Yes.
Readers want to find a
connection with the lead character. But
likable characters need balance with obviously flawed characters, sometimes,
selfish, jealous, or manipulative. These
characters bring depth to the story and make it memorable. Most of the time, when I think about any
novel, while the description of the world is important, the characters remain
with me.
No comments:
Post a Comment